Monday, July 15, 2013
To Have or to Be?
Erich Seligmann
Fromm ( 1900 – 1980 ) was a German social psychologist, psychoanalyst, sociologist, humanistic philosopher, and democratic socialist. He was associated with what became
known as the Frankfurt
School of critical
theory.
Fromm used the story of Adam and Eve as an allegorical
explanation for human biological evolution and existential angst, asserting
that when Adam and Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge, they became aware of
themselves as being separate from nature while still being part of it. This is
why they felt "naked" and "ashamed": they had evolved into
human beings, conscious of themselves, their own mortality, and their
powerlessness before the forces of nature and society, and no longer united
with the universe as they were in their instinctive, pre-human existence as
animals. According to Fromm, the awareness of a disunited human existence is a
source of guilt and shame, and the solution to this existential dichotomy is
found in the development of one's uniquely human powers of love and reason.
Fromm viewed the experience of "falling in love" as
evidence of one's failure to understand the true nature of love, which he
believed always had the common elements of care, responsibility, respect,
and knowledge.
Noam Chomsky
"liked Fromm's attitudes but thought his work was pretty
superficial."
To Have or to Be? is a 1976 book by Fromm
that differentiates between having and being. The point of being is more
important as everyone is mortal, and thus having of possessions will become
useless after their death, because the possessions which are transferred to the
life after death, will be what the person actually was inside.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment